Melotte Consulting

Start with a technical review

A fixed-cost way to bring clarity to messy systems before committing to bigger change.

The Technical Review is for businesses whose systems mostly work, but feel brittle, manual, overcomplicated, or hard to trust. It gives you an experienced outside view of what is happening, what is worth fixing, and what should happen next.

It is designed for situations where the problem is not purely technical. The aim is to understand how the workflow behaves in practice, where confidence drops, and what would create the strongest improvement without pushing you into an oversized rebuild.

Designed for clarity

A practical outside view before you commit to larger change.

The output is meant to make the next decision easier, not to bury the problem under generic recommendations.

Two focused sessions

A practical review shaped around the workflow, systems, and delivery friction you are dealing with now.

Clear review summary

A concise summary of what is working, what is fragile, and where effort is most likely to pay off.

Practical next steps

A sensible way forward without vague strategy language, oversized rebuilds, or unnecessary tooling.

Start the review

A fixed-cost first step with a simple guided follow-on.

Start with a short summary here and we will reply with the right next step. In some cases that will be direct access to the review flow. In others, a brief introductory call will come first so the review is properly grounded.

We will route you to the right next step: either a portal invite for setup or an introductory booking link first.

Fixed cost

£200

A focused review with written recommendations and a sensible route forward, without having to commit to a larger implementation first.

If the review goes ahead, the follow-on steps cover the short questionnaire, session booking, and the supporting intake details in the right order.

Good fit

Useful when the systems mostly work, but confidence in them does not.

This is especially helpful when the issue is not simply “we need a new tool”, but a mix of fragile automations, unclear ownership, inconsistent reporting, or workflows that have drifted away from how the business actually runs.

  • The business depends on workarounds, manual checks, or tribal knowledge to keep things moving.
  • Automations exist, but nobody feels fully confident changing them.
  • Tools have accumulated over time and the operating picture no longer feels coherent.

Start with the system that feels hardest to trust.

Bring the workflow, reporting surface, automation chain, or delivery area that keeps causing doubt, delay, or rework. That is usually enough to make the review worthwhile.